– Dr Gordon McDonald, the principal investigator at NASA, points out in an article published in the journal Astronautics in the July 1962 issue that by analyzing data on the observed difference between the actual moon movements in orbit and the calculated movements can conclude that the Earth’s natural satellite is rather empty inside. Lon Hood, the team leader, said, “I knew the core of the Moon was small, but I did not know it is so small … This even adds weight to the idea that the Moon’s origin is unique, unlike any other terrestrial organism – Earth, Venus, Mars or Mercury. – A team at the University of Arizona said they thought the Moon had a nucleus, but it is small. The same happened with Apollo 13 when one of the rocket stages produced vibrations for three hours. The waves resounded for eight minutes and at the end, Maurice Ewing, a co-director of the seismic experiment, said at a press conference “he sounded like a bell”. – The Apollo12 mission installed seismographs and then intentionally collapsed the moon module causing an equivalent impact with a ton of TNT. Here are some of the scientific studies that show that the Moon seems to be empty inside: There are countless clues that the Moon is empty. The moon is empty Mysteries of the Moon | It Was Built By Aliens? 700 million years older than our solar system!ģ. But at the Apollo Appointments Conference held in 1974, NASA scientists announced bringing Earth 5.3 billion years old. In fact, our scientists estimated the age of the Earth and the entire solar system. Neil Armstrong’s rook is 4.6 billion years old. Between 19, six Apollo missions brought 382 kg of Moon rocks, samples, pebbles, sand and dust to Earth on Earth. When the first moorings took place, several rocks on the Moon were brought to Earth. ” Looking around at the other planets and their satellites, and gathering everything we know about cosmography and cosmic laws, the Moon should not exist in the Earth’s orbit. So the Earth should have a larger satellite or around 100 kilometres… But it’s not like that. Generally, when a planet has satellites around them they are much smaller than the planet itself. “The moon, which has neither the atmosphere nor the magnetic field, is actually a weirdness of nature.īeing bigger than Pluto, some scientists even called it a twin planetary system. Isaac Asimov, a Russian biochemistry professor, and writer of popular science books said that: The Mysteries of the MoonĬhristopher Knight and Alan Butler explain in their book “Who built the moon?” That our satellite is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be much easier in the mass than it should be again orbit Is suitable for a body of this magnitude. Whether those mentioned above were right or not, let’s see some of the mysteries surrounding this natural or artificial Earth satellite. Leonard published “Someone on the Moon,” in which he reprinted several NASA photos of the lunar surface claiming the theory above. In 1975, Donald Wilson published “Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon: Is Our Nearest Neighbor A Huge Alien Spacecraft?” in which he provided evidence to support this theory. They have postulated that the moon comprises an outer rocky layer a few kilometres thick, covering a strong hull, probably 45 km thick, under which there is a vacuum, possibly containing an atmosphere. Aliens, with superior new technology, were able to disguise their ship in a celestial body and launch it into orbit. The two assumed that the Moon is a giant extraterrestrial ship that was covered with a rock to look like a natural satellite. In 1970, Mihail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, two Russian scientists from the Soviet Academy of Sciences, proposed the theory of the Moon as an alien ship. This image depicts the catastrophic collision of two planetary bodies similar in a composition that led to the formation of the Earth and its moon 4.5 billion years ago. But this is just a theory, and although it seems logical at first glance, there are some voices among scientists who claim that certain features of the Moon do not match this assumption. The remnants of the Terra were pulled into ring-shaped circles around the Earth, before they regrouped, giving birth to the Moon. It is believed that our planet would not have been hit frontal but tangential, as it would just be called “scalp”. Mysteries | The theory accepted by most scientists about the origin of the Moon is that the Earth, barely formed, collided with another body, having almost the size of Mars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |